Translate

Thursday, December 21, 2017

We Have Work To Do


We have work to do. 

Those are the initial findings of a report commissioned by the Needham Public Schools (NPS) to study and understand issues of racial equity and inclusion in our schools and classrooms. Our equity consultant, Ms. Christine Robinson, shared the Equity Audit: Initial Findings with the School Committee at a recent meeting attended by almost 100 parents, teachers, and administrators.

Ms. Robinson interviewed or conducted focus groups with over 250 parents, community members, staff, and students and studied various documents, policies, and student data as part of her audit of equity and inclusion in the NPS.  She grounded her study within a conceptual framework of intersectionality, a theory that suggests individuals possess multiple identities, including race, gender, social class, ethnicity, nationality, sexual orientation, religion, age, mental and physical disability, as well as other forms of identity.  Intersectionality means it is insufficient to look only at one’s race when considering equity and inclusion because we possess other identities that may intersect with our race to impact our experiences in the world.

Key findings in the report include:

·      Root causes of disparities in education are centuries in the making; they are embedded in our nation's history. Still today, disparities affect the lives of students, faculty, administrators, parents, and staff of NPS.

·      NPS is becoming more diverse each year with over 50 languages spoken at home by the district’s families, with a wide variety of cultures, faith traditions, types of families, sexual identities, races, ethnicities, learning styles, disabilities, and countries of origin. Not everyone feels welcome or understood in the Needham Public Schools.

·      NPS parents, students and staff report experiencing or observing multiple instances of discrimination at the micro-level (joking, teasing, bullying, isolation) or at the macro-level from the media, public/political institutions, public safety, or other adults.

It was both challenging and uncomfortable for me as Needham’s superintendent to hear these findings and realize that there are parents, staff, and students who do not experience the Needham Public Schools or Needham community in a way that is consistently safe, welcoming, supportive, and caring. Some students of color expressed feeling marginalized or harassed; their parents feel unheard and disconnected; and their teachers, for example, express concern and anxiety about doing or saying the right thing when the issue of race surfaces. 

The findings also suggest that when students feel marginalized because of their race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, or language, they experience a level of anxiety and distress that interferes with their learning and achievement.  As an academic institution whose primary mission is to educate all children to high levels, it is simply unacceptable to have any student feel unsafe or marginalized, especially if it results in a loss of learning and growth—and a loss of human potential.

So we have work to do.

Along with these key findings, the report suggests that we can build on our many strong assets (e.g., Launching Scholars) and existing programs (e.g., Social and Emotional Learning) to address real issues and challenges.  Fortunately, we have outstanding teachers, administrators, and staff who are dedicated to improvement and boosting student learning.

Some of the key recommendations include:

·      Listen deeply to the perspectives of diverse communities, respect their inherent wisdom, and be responsive to them.

·      Develop an inclusive partnership with schools and the community, with sensitivity to the needs of youth who have been traditionally marginalized. This group includes students of color, youth from poor neighborhoods, adjudicated youth, LGBTQ youth, disabled youth, youth in the child welfare system, homeless youth, and all other populations.

·      Provide additional training for teachers, administrators, and other staff to directly overcome implicit and explicit bias. Enable them to engage more frequently in difficult conversations, for example, about race, religion, sexual identity and orientation, and ethnicity.

·      Ensure our students receive a culturally responsive curriculum in all schools from grades Pre-K to 12, with ongoing review of data as part of an evidence-informed approach to ensue academic equity and achievement.

·      Build systemic equity in school cultures/climates; budget for and provide resources; expand communications and outreach to all families and students to ensure they are welcomed and included.

Ensuring a safe, positive, and equitable school culture are fundamental to who we are and what we believe; in fact the District’s core values, which are the foundation for everything we do, already articulate the critical nature of this work in Needham.  For example, our core value of Community is defined in this way:  A school culture that encourages communication, understanding, and is actively anti-racist.  A culture in which sharing ideas and valuing multiple perspectives ensures a caring community committed to the promotion of human dignity.  Our core values provide direction and reinforce the critical nature of this work.

There is a lot to consider here, and it will be the responsibility of each member of the school community and the Town to act.  With core values already in place to guide a talented and committed staff, we start from a good place.  We must also lean on the community to assist and support us.  Racist behavior, inequities in living (or learning) standards, bias against any individual, and an intolerance for human differences are not only school issues—these are issues for families, faith communities, the Town, and, indeed, the entire nation to address.  Clearly, and as the evidence suggests, we in the NPS play a key role.

With energy, hope, and a deep belief in the promise and possibility of each one of our young people, I commit to work with the School Committee, staff, parents, community members, and, especially students, to build on our strong assets and tackle these challenges.

Yes, we have urgent work to do — and we are committed to this work for the long term.

Let’s get on with it.



16 comments:

  1. I think you should stop worrying about what color people are and what languages they speak and start focusing on your job which is education. You know 2+2=4. It's not your job to brainwash our children. You are creating 50% antifa candidates and the other half will be in the kkk

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dear Anonymous:

      I will entertain a response to your email if you will have the courage to include your name.

      Dan Gutekanst

      Delete
  2. As the comment above illustrates, our community clearly has along way to go in learning how to treat the ideas and experiences of other with understanding and respect. This commenter exemplifies the systematic challenges Ms Robinson highlighted, which extend beyond our schools into the community.

    As reported in the audit, children in our schools are hearing these kinds of comments from their peers:
    "Brown is bad, ugly, scary, poor"
    "Go back to your country, we don't want you here"
    "All Latinos are drug dealers; what does your daddy do?"
    "Go work in a field"
    "Don't touch me if you're brown"

    This is horrifying — how is teaching children to not say hateful, racist things to others brainwashing? This is especially challenging for our school system, since these are attitudes that are being learned *outside* of school. That is why we as a community must support the work happening in the schools, and also support the students who are speaking out against this kind of racism.

    We can stop "worrying about what color people are" when it is no longer the basis of harassment, discrimination, and hate. Let's hope that our schools can teach this next generation to have more compassion, understanding, and acceptance of differences than their parents do.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thank you for your openness and honesty. There is a lot of work to do, but as a community, we can tackle the issue of equity. Long after our children have no memory of calculus (!), I would hope that they would be kind, thoughtful, empathic, and open-minded.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It seems to me that empathy, thoughtfulness and kindness can and should be taught at home.... and it turns out calculus (!?!) is a rather useful skill in the modern economy. I would rather have my children be prepared for the modern world, thanks.

      Delete
  4. I am very encouraged by your response to the findings of the audit. It demonstrates your deep intellectual understanding of the issues and, most importantly, the effects of discrimination and alienation on the education of our children. I agree that "it will be the responsibility of each member of the school community and the Town to act," and that we must marshal the communal will to effect change. To be sure, leadership will be required, and you, as Superintendent, have a unique platform to lead the charge. (I am confident you have great support in Aaron Sicotte and Tamatha Bibbo, who have also demonstrated their commitment to these issues.) In addition to the social-emotional component of this work, the implications for curriculum, I believe, are dire. We must be intentional about including, from elementary school on, curricular materials that speak from the perspectives of marginalized communities, and that explicitly teach about the conditions and events in American history that have led to the racial and socio-economic inequalities we have today. Only in this way can we have an open dialogue and can we truly begin to understand each other. Thank you for your thoughtful response and for your continued leadership in this important area.

    ReplyDelete
  5. My goodness. Where and when did we get so far off the rails?

    Open questions for our community:

    1. Would anyone expect an "EQUITY CONSULTANT" to arrive and say "all is well, nothing to see here?"

    2. While I agree with Dr. G on almost all of his positions, this blog post seems to take all findings at face value and agreeing to committing resources to 'fix' things with uncertain goals. While I disagree with the initial posters extreme views on outcomes, don't we think as a community we should be debating the use of resources? While there are endless goals for our schools, perhaps our community doesnt want extra PD days for teachers, or replacing existing PD days focused on how to engage our children in the fundamentals of learning (including Calculus, which unlike others, our family DOES believe this is a useful skill!), instead of focusing on training "to directly overcome implicit and explicit bias. Enable them to engage more frequently in difficult conversations, for example, about race, religion, sexual identity and orientation, and ethnicity."

    Political correctness is wonderful, but resources are not unlimited. Lets focus on the core and VOTE on reallocating resources based on the opinion of an "equity consultant".

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We DO vote on how to allocate resources: we vote for School Committee members, who develop the school budget. We vote for Town Meeting members, who in turn vote on the budget. There is a public hearing on the school budget every year, at which time members of the community can comment on the proposed budget.

      I am curious if you actually watched the presentation, or are just reacting to Dr. G's post? The whole point of the audit is that, due to issues of inequity in our schools, not all students have equal access to the "fundamentals of learning" you so value. This is not about political correctness, but rather about systematic inequity that leads to worse academic outcomes for students of color and other marginalized groups.

      I encourage you to watch the full presentation (available on the Needham Channel website) so that you may better understand the goal of the audit, and the need for action by our community.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous (please share your name), I think that you're missing the point. The consultant did not just breeze through Needham and decide that things needed to be fixed. She interviewed MANY students, teachers, administrators, and parents. I attended one of the focus groups for parents, and can attest to her thoughtfulness and lack of bias. Be careful about the assumptions that you make.

      Delete
    3. Ms. Bruel,

      I will take you up on your suggestion of watching the presentation in its entirety.

      However, as a non Caucasian, I find it curious when these comments about "systematic inequity that leads to worse academic outcomes' never includes groups like ours (India Indians, Chinese, Koreans, Japanese, Former Soviet Eastern Europeans).

      On the budgetary allocations, we actually agree. Thank you for outlining how budgets and priorities are approved. My point was that after these budget resources were approved and allocated, seemingly these new priorities are getting immediate attention, without going through the approvals that would be expected for, lets say full day Kindergarten.

      Ms. Sally.

      I think it is you that are missing the point. These are curious conclusions drawn considering we are talking about proving unconscious bias! Just because she spoke to MANY people and showed no bias, does not mean there was no bias in the report. To illustrate, I would be happy to retract my position if *ONE* example of the author's similar reports coming back with conclusions that 'everything is fine, nothing to see here'.

      Lastly, as I have Children in the NPS system, considering the witch hunt that this Town exhibits when someone disagrees (Reference: Needham Facebook pages) is the reason I chose to stay anonymous.

      Delete
    4. I'm glad you will watch the whole presentation. I think you'll find you're making a lot of assumptions about both the scope and goal of the audit. The group of families and students interviewed for the study represented 40 countries of origin and spoke 25 different languages. It was very clearly stated that issues of marginalization and inequity are not limited to race, but also country of origin, disability, religion, language, gender identity and socioeconomic status (among other things). None of the preliminary recommendations are specific to a particular race or group.

      One of Ms. Robinson's main recommendations is for us as a community to learn to be more open and responsive to the experiences of others, and to become more comfortable having these difficult conversations. Your fear of providing your name clearly illustrates the work we need to do in this area. I believe that being able to engage is these kinds of conversations, and learn from the experiences of others, is one of the most "useful" skills we can teach or kids, and I fully support the hard work NPS has ahead of it to achieve this goal.

      Delete
  6. As the parent of biracial children in the Needham schools, I brace myself daily against the discriminatory behavior, regardless of how subtle (or not) it is. We must continue to commit ourselves to educating ALL of our children, and these are qualities that can and should be taught in schools. It is true that empathy can be taught at home. But often it isn't. Calculus can also be taught at home, but often it isn't. Therefore we turn to our community schools as a place to help educate our children fully, and to help provide them with all the tools they will bring into their adult lives. Needham is doing a great job, but yes, we could be doing more.
    - Tanya Laidlaw

    ReplyDelete
  7. After watching the presentation and reading the accompanying PowerPoint presentation, there are a few themes.

    1. Communication CHANNEL problems. Good feedback, and presumably easy to implement and course-correct.

    2. Datapoints of blatant racism. ANY instances of such (eg, the High School bathroom incident being the most recently notable) should be aggressively pursued and examples made of perpetrators. While this will not win hearts, this kind of behavior cannot/should not be tolerated.

    3. The methodology used was, frankly, poor and unscientific. Simply put, jumping from "X was observed then Y was observed" is referred to correlation does not prove causation error. Why wouldn't various groups of 'minorities' be polled and results collected and results compared (eg, Af American, Indian, Chinese, Japanese, East European, Hispanic, Korean..) whatever we have a reasonable sample size? and compare answers. Only then can we see what the Needham-wide problems are vs an external issue or issues with a specific sub groups or groups.

    4. Overall, a lot of cut and paste content. For context, fine, but some was not on point.

    4. Curious, is this a budgeting line item, and if so, how much did this cost?

    5. More than a few exampled stretched looking to make a point: "my kid is new and MAY be viewed as a racial minority and no one is doing anything about it.". Really? Now we are supposed to dig into the hearts and minds of Elementary school Children and mandate who they have to be friends with?

    6. Proposals strongly suggesting changing staff to fit diversity goals should be fully rejected out of hand and dismissed. BEST. PEOPLE. FOR. EACH. ROLE. Period.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I When you are new to QuickBooks and If you are looking for contact information for QuickBooks, contact them at
    QuickBooks customer service +1 855-604-1500 to get instant assistance

    ReplyDelete
  9. Very well explained and informative blog .
    Get Financial Accounting Service or For more details contact us at QuickBooks Customer Support Phone Number +18556753194

    ReplyDelete
  10. Thanks for sharing good blog. . If you are looking for help with QuickBooks, then call them at
    QuickBooks Customer Service +16159337123 for all your queries and unsolvable problems.

    ReplyDelete